General Archives

Are you need IT Support Engineer? Free Consultant

General

January 23, 2025
jvassociatesadmin

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors V/s Century Textiles and Industries Limited & Ors – Supreme Court says: “Where two provisions appear to be in tension, the proper course is to adopt a construction that reconciles them, allowing both to operate and giving effect to the underlying legislative intent”

In the year 1918 , Century Textiles and Industries Limited (Respondent No.1),had applied to the Improvement Trust under Section 32B under the provisions of the City of Bombay Improvement Act,

January 21, 2025
jvassociatesadmin

Judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court cannot be declared as illegal Under Article 32 of the Constitution , says Supreme Court

In Vimal Babu Dhumadiya & ors. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors, Supreme Court held on 17/01/2025 that Judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court cannot be

January 20, 2025
jvassociatesadmin

M/s Naresh Potteries Vs M/s Aarti Industries- Supreme Court clarifies the Role of Authorized Representative in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Involving Companies

2025 INSC 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 8659 of 2023) M/S NARESH POTTERIES …APPELLANT(S)

January 20, 2025
jvassociatesadmin

When amount is borrowed on the security of blank cheque , the lender has authority to fill up and present it before bank : Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court in Nakulan v. State of Kerala and another held that When amount is borrowed giving a blank cheque as security for repayment,

January 18, 2025
jvassociatesadmin

Resigned Director Not Liable For Cheque Issued By Company After His Resignation: Supreme Court

Supreme Court bench comprising Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Justice Rajesh Bindal in Criminal Appeal arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No(s). 16051-16052 of 2023 (Adhiraj Singh versus Yograj Singh and others)

January 18, 2025
jvassociatesadmin

Gist of noteworthy Trademark Cases in the year 2024

Some of the noteworthy trademark-cases decided /considered by various courts under the Trademarks Act 1999 are: Inter IKEA Systems BV v. I Key Home Studio LLP -Delhi High Court-CS(COMM) 1143/2024-

January 16, 2025
jvassociatesadmin

The activities of the Trade Union with reference to the provisions of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 do not amount to a commercial activity to attract Section 29(4)(b) Trade Marks Act 1999 – Kerala High Court

HDFC Bank Staff Union v. Banking Ombudsman & Others – The activities of the Trade Union with reference to the provisions of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 do not amount

September 19, 2024
jvassociatesadmin

Buy Back of Shares of Unlisted Companies

1.INTRODUCTION Buy back of shares means buying back of its own shares or other specified securities by the company from the holder thereof and cancelling them. Some of the purposes

September 19, 2024
jvassociatesadmin

Reduction of Share Capital of a Company – An Overview

1. INTRODUCTION Reduction of share capital means the reduction of already issued, subscribed and paid-up capital of the Company. The reduction of capital is mainly done by companies for: -Returning

September 7, 2024
jvassociatesadmin

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023

THE DIGITAL PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT, 2023 INTRODUCTION An Act to provide for the processing of digital personal data in a manner that recognizes both the right of individuals to