Multiple aggrieved persons can file a single, consolidated application under SARFAESI Act- Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court on 4th June, 2025 held that multiple aggrieved persons can file a single, consolidated application under
Homebuyers cannot claim Bank Loan Interest from Developer for Delay In Flat Delivery: Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) through its Estate Officer (H) V/s Anupam Garg etc
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 — In a prosecution alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the NI Act, the complainant has an initial burden to prove the transaction, which led to execution of the cheque alleged to be issued by the accused in his favour.
The case Vishnu Prasad v. Gracy Yohannan (Crl.A No. 1216 of 2013) (2025 KLT OnLine 2081) Decided on 4th June,
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, S.138 Proviso (b) — Presence of additional claims in the demand notice would not negate its validity, provided the cheque amount is specified.
The case Apputty v. Yahutty ( Crl.Rev.Pet No. 778 of 2004 ) (2025 KLT OnLine 2076) Decided on 28th May
Migration of RoC Annual Forms to MCA21 V3
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA) is migrating filing of the Annual Forms such as AOC-4, AOC-4(XBRL), AOC-4 Addendum/CSR-2,
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, S. 138 – If a cheque is issued to secure repayment of debt or liability and if the debt is not discharged and if on the date of presentation of the cheque, the liability to pay the amount exists and if the said cheque dishonours upon presentation, the consequences contemplated under Section 138 of N.I.Act would follow.
The case Radhakrishnan v. Kerala Agro Industries Corporation Ltd 2025 (Crl.Rev.Pet No. 1340 of 2019) ( KLT OnLine 2063)
DRT Can’t Decide Disputes under section 11 of SARFAESI Act; Must Be Referred To Arbitration : Supreme Court
Section 11 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 says: “ Where
An employment contract clause stipulating the employee to work for a minimum term and in default to pay liquidated damage is not – necessarily – violative of Section 27 of the Contract Act.
Whether the employment contract clause stipulating the employee to work for a minimum term and in default to pay liquidated
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law, Law of limitation
NCLAT has no power to condone delay beyond 45 days under IBC
The IBC prescribes strict timelines for filing appeals and taking legal action so as to ensure that insolvency proceedings are not misused
Calling an Annual General Meeting at Shorter Notice under the Companies Act, 2013 – Law, Procedure, Drafting, and Specimen Formats
Introduction The Companies Act, 2013 mandates every company to hold an Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) within the prescribed statutory period.
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-5
Having thoroughly examined the entire matter factually and legally, Supreme Court arrived at the following irresistible conclusions: – Conclusions of
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-4
Having regard to the elaborate submissions made by the learned Senior Advocates appearing for the parties, having thoroughly gone through
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-3
The Supreme Court continued to hear the other issues on merits. Both the appellants and respondents submitted their arguments. Appellants
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-2
Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of NCLAT in Bhushan Steel Insolvency case, some of the promoters
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-1
On the Civil Appeal preferred by an operational creditor of M/s. Bhushan Power and Steel Limited namely Kalyani Transco and
Order passed by a Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be challenged by filing a revision petition under any provision of the BNSS or the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The Kerala High Court in Union Bank of India v. Manaf (2025 KLT OnLine 1816) vide its judgement dated 10/04/2025
Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive
Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive. They are not mandatory, obligatory or peremptory.
Summons through electronic mode such as email, Whatsapp or Telegram-Notification
The Kerala Procedure for Service of Summons Rules, 2025 has been notified . As per the rules , upon receipt
General, Negotiable Instruments Act
When complainant files a statement that the cheque amount had been received, nothing further remains to be adjudicated and therefore parties can be allowed to compound the matter.
The question before the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the Criminal Revision Petition # 2024/2012 in the matter of G.Sasidharan Versus
Limitation Period be counted from the date when the right to sue first accrues ;Not On Full Knowledge thereof.
Section 3 of The Limitation Act, 1963 says that time-barred suits must be dismissed even if the limitation is not