Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-3
The Supreme Court continued to hear the other issues on merits. Both the appellants and respondents submitted their arguments. Appellants
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-2
Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of NCLAT in Bhushan Steel Insolvency case, some of the promoters
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-1
On the Civil Appeal preferred by an operational creditor of M/s. Bhushan Power and Steel Limited namely Kalyani Transco and
Order passed by a Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be challenged by filing a revision petition under any provision of the BNSS or the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The Kerala High Court in Union Bank of India v. Manaf (2025 KLT OnLine 1816) vide its judgement dated 10/04/2025
Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive
Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive. They are not mandatory, obligatory or peremptory.
Summons through electronic mode such as email, Whatsapp or Telegram-Notification
The Kerala Procedure for Service of Summons Rules, 2025 has been notified . As per the rules , upon receipt
General, Negotiable Instruments Act
When complainant files a statement that the cheque amount had been received, nothing further remains to be adjudicated and therefore parties can be allowed to compound the matter.
The question before the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the Criminal Revision Petition # 2024/2012 in the matter of G.Sasidharan Versus
Limitation Period be counted from the date when the right to sue first accrues ;Not On Full Knowledge thereof.
Section 3 of The Limitation Act, 1963 says that time-barred suits must be dismissed even if the limitation is not
Code of Civil Procedure, General, SEBI Laws
SEBI cannot claim exemption from the applicability of the principle of res judicata – Supreme Court
The principles of res judicata would be equally applicable in proceedings before administrative authorities. SEBI cannot claim exemption from the
Only the certificate issued under Section 137 of the Trademarks Act1991 can be used for legal purposes.
Only the certificate issued under Section 137 of the Trademarks Act1991 has validity in legal proceedings; not the registration certificate.
Court has first to decide pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain a commercial suit.
In a commercial suit filed before the Additional Munsiff Court, Cherthala, the defendant questioned the maintainability of the suit on
MCA invites comments on draft rules to Expand the Scope of Fast-Track Mergers
MCA has notified draft Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment Rules, 2025 on 04/04/2025 in order to expand the scope
Setting criminal law in motion by suppressing material facts and documents is nothing but an abuse of the process of law
2025 INSC 399 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 724 OF 2025 REKHA
Proceedings cannot be continued or initiated against the natural persons under section 138 NI Act if the cause of action arose after the commencement of the insolvency process.
2025 INSC 346 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 @ SPECIAL
The moratorium under Section 96 of the IBC does not extend to regulatory penalties imposed for non-compliance with consumer protection laws – Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court in SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL Versus BHAVESH DHIRAJLAL SHETH & ORS – CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4048 OF 2024-
Supreme Court reiterates non-executive and independent director(s) cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the NI Act
2025 INSC 315REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025[Arising out of SLP (Criminal)
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors V/s Century Textiles and Industries Limited & Ors – Supreme Court says: “Where two provisions appear to be in tension, the proper course is to adopt a construction that reconciles them, allowing both to operate and giving effect to the underlying legislative intent”
In the year 1918 , Century Textiles and Industries Limited (Respondent No.1),had applied to the Improvement Trust under Section 32B
Judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court cannot be declared as illegal Under Article 32 of the Constitution , says Supreme Court
In Vimal Babu Dhumadiya & ors. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors, Supreme Court held on 17/01/2025 that Judgment
M/s Naresh Potteries Vs M/s Aarti Industries- Supreme Court clarifies the Role of Authorized Representative in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Involving Companies
2025 INSC 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of
When amount is borrowed on the security of blank cheque , the lender has authority to fill up and present it before bank : Kerala High Court
Kerala High Court in Nakulan v. State of Kerala and another held that When amount