When complainant files a statement that the cheque amount had been received, nothing further remains to be adjudicated and therefore parties can be allowed to compound the matter.
The question before the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the Criminal
Limitation Period be counted from the date when the right to sue first accrues ;Not On Full Knowledge thereof.
Section 3 of The Limitation Act, 1963 says that time-barred
SEBI cannot claim exemption from the applicability of the principle of res judicata – Supreme Court
The principles of res judicata would be equally applicable in
Only the certificate issued under Section 137 of the Trademarks Act1991 can be used for legal purposes.
Only the certificate issued under Section 137 of the Trademarks
Court has first to decide pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain a commercial suit.
In a commercial suit filed before the Additional Munsiff Court,
MCA invites comments on draft rules to Expand the Scope of Fast-Track Mergers
MCA has notified draft Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment
Setting criminal law in motion by suppressing material facts and documents is nothing but an abuse of the process of law
2025 INSC 399 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Proceedings cannot be continued or initiated against the natural persons under section 138 NI Act if the cause of action arose after the commencement of the insolvency process.
2025 INSC 346 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
The moratorium under Section 96 of the IBC does not extend to regulatory penalties imposed for non-compliance with consumer protection laws – Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court in SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL Versus BHAVESH DHIRAJLAL
Supreme Court reiterates non-executive and independent director(s) cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the NI Act
2025 INSC 315REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors V/s Century Textiles and Industries Limited & Ors – Supreme Court says: “Where two provisions appear to be in tension, the proper course is to adopt a construction that reconciles them, allowing both to operate and giving effect to the underlying legislative intent”
In the year 1918 , Century Textiles and Industries Limited
Judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court cannot be declared as illegal Under Article 32 of the Constitution , says Supreme Court
In Vimal Babu Dhumadiya & ors. Versus The State of
M/s Naresh Potteries Vs M/s Aarti Industries- Supreme Court clarifies the Role of Authorized Representative in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Involving Companies
2025 INSC 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL
When amount is borrowed on the security of blank cheque , the lender has authority to fill up and present it before bank : Kerala High Court
Kerala High Court in Nakulan v. State of Kerala and
Resigned Director Not Liable For Cheque Issued By Company After His Resignation: Supreme Court
Supreme Court bench comprising Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Justice Rajesh
Gist of noteworthy Trademark Cases in the year 2024
Some of the noteworthy trademark-cases decided /considered by various courts
Category
Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive
Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling,
Summons through electronic mode such as email, Whatsapp or Telegram-Notification
The Kerala Procedure for Service of Summons Rules, 2025 has
When complainant files a statement that the cheque amount had been received, nothing further remains to be adjudicated and therefore parties can be allowed to compound the matter.
The question before the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the Criminal
Limitation Period be counted from the date when the right to sue first accrues ;Not On Full Knowledge thereof.
Section 3 of The Limitation Act, 1963 says that time-barred
SEBI cannot claim exemption from the applicability of the principle of res judicata – Supreme Court
The principles of res judicata would be equally applicable in
Only the certificate issued under Section 137 of the Trademarks Act1991 can be used for legal purposes.
Only the certificate issued under Section 137 of the Trademarks
Court has first to decide pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain a commercial suit.
In a commercial suit filed before the Additional Munsiff Court,
MCA invites comments on draft rules to Expand the Scope of Fast-Track Mergers
MCA has notified draft Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment
Setting criminal law in motion by suppressing material facts and documents is nothing but an abuse of the process of law
2025 INSC 399 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Proceedings cannot be continued or initiated against the natural persons under section 138 NI Act if the cause of action arose after the commencement of the insolvency process.
2025 INSC 346 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
The moratorium under Section 96 of the IBC does not extend to regulatory penalties imposed for non-compliance with consumer protection laws – Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court in SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL Versus BHAVESH DHIRAJLAL
Supreme Court reiterates non-executive and independent director(s) cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the NI Act
2025 INSC 315REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors V/s Century Textiles and Industries Limited & Ors – Supreme Court says: “Where two provisions appear to be in tension, the proper course is to adopt a construction that reconciles them, allowing both to operate and giving effect to the underlying legislative intent”
In the year 1918 , Century Textiles and Industries Limited
Judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court cannot be declared as illegal Under Article 32 of the Constitution , says Supreme Court
In Vimal Babu Dhumadiya & ors. Versus The State of
M/s Naresh Potteries Vs M/s Aarti Industries- Supreme Court clarifies the Role of Authorized Representative in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Involving Companies
2025 INSC 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL