jvassociatesadmin

Who Can Use the SARFAESI Act? – Banks, NBFCs & Financial Institutions Explained

The SARFAESI Act, 2002 grants powerful recovery rights to lenders, allowing them to enforce security interests without approaching civil courts. However,

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors V/s Century Textiles and Industries Limited & Ors – Supreme Court says: “Where two provisions appear to be in tension, the proper course is to adopt a construction that reconciles them, allowing both to operate and giving effect to the underlying legislative intent”

In the year 1918 , Century Textiles and Industries Limited (Respondent No.1),had applied to the Improvement Trust under Section 32B under

Judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court cannot be declared as illegal Under Article 32 of the Constitution , says Supreme Court

In Vimal Babu Dhumadiya & ors. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors, Supreme Court held on 17/01/2025 that Judgment of

When Can a Bank Invoke SARFAESI Proceedings?

Banks and financial institutions frequently initiate recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 when borrowers default in repayment. However, SARFAESI action

M/s Naresh Potteries Vs M/s Aarti Industries- Supreme Court clarifies the Role of Authorized Representative in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Involving Companies

2025 INSC 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP

When amount is borrowed on the security of blank cheque , the lender has authority to fill up and present it before bank : Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court in Nakulan v. State of Kerala and another held that When amount is

Resigned Director Not Liable For Cheque Issued By Company After His Resignation: Supreme Court

Supreme Court bench comprising Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Justice Rajesh Bindal in Criminal Appeal arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No(s). 16051-16052

Gist of noteworthy Trademark Cases in the year 2024

Some of the noteworthy trademark-cases decided /considered by various courts under the Trademarks Act 1999 are: Inter IKEA Systems BV v.

The activities of the Trade Union with reference to the provisions of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 do not amount to a commercial activity to attract Section 29(4)(b) Trade Marks Act 1999 – Kerala High Court

HDFC Bank Staff Union v. Banking Ombudsman & Others – The activities of the Trade Union with reference to the provisions

Difference Between SARFAESI Act and DRT Act – Explained Simply

Borrowers facing loan recovery proceedings often hear two legal terms together: SARFAESI Act and DRT Act. While both deal with recovery

Author: jvassociatesadmin