NCLAT has no power to condone delay beyond 45 days under IBC
The IBC prescribes strict timelines for filing appeals and taking legal action so as to ensure that insolvency proceedings are not misused to
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-5
Having thoroughly examined the entire matter factually and legally, Supreme Court arrived at the following irresistible conclusions: – Conclusions of the
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-4
Having regard to the elaborate submissions made by the learned Senior Advocates appearing for the parties, having thoroughly gone through the
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-3
The Supreme Court continued to hear the other issues on merits. Both the appellants and respondents submitted their arguments. Appellants Submissions
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-2
Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of NCLAT in Bhushan Steel Insolvency case, some of the promoters of
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-1
On the Civil Appeal preferred by an operational creditor of M/s. Bhushan Power and Steel Limited namely Kalyani Transco and others,
The moratorium under Section 96 of the IBC does not extend to regulatory penalties imposed for non-compliance with consumer protection laws – Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court in SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL Versus BHAVESH DHIRAJLAL SHETH & ORS – CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4048 OF 2024- DECIDED