Court has first to decide pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain a commercial suit.
In a  commercial suit filed before  the Additional Munsiff Court, Cherthala,  the defendant questioned  the maintainability of the suit on the
MCA invites comments on draft rules to Expand the Scope of Fast-Track Mergers
MCA has notified  draft Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment Rules, 2025 on 04/04/2025 in order to expand the scope of
Setting criminal law in motion by suppressing material facts and documents is nothing but an abuse of the process of law
2025 INSC 399 REPORTABLE Â IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 724 OF 2025 Â REKHA SHARAD
Proceedings cannot be continued or initiated against the natural persons under section 138 NI Act if the cause of action arose after the commencement of the insolvency process.
2025 INSC 346 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 @ SPECIAL LEAVE
The moratorium under Section 96 of the IBC does not extend to regulatory penalties imposed for non-compliance with consumer protection laws – Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court in SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL Versus BHAVESH DHIRAJLAL SHETH & ORS – CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4048 OF 2024- DECIDED
Supreme  Court reiterates  non-executive and independent director(s) cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the NI Act
2025 INSC 315REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIACRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025[Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors V/s Century Textiles and Industries Limited & Ors – Supreme Court says: “Where two provisions appear to be in tension, the proper course is to adopt a construction that reconciles them, allowing both to operate and giving effect to the underlying legislative intent”
In the year 1918 , Century Textiles and Industries Limited (Respondent No.1),had applied to the Improvement Trust under Section 32B under
Judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court cannot be declared as illegal  Under Article 32 of the Constitution , says Supreme Court
In Vimal Babu Dhumadiya & ors. Versus  The State   of  Maharashtra & Ors,  Supreme Court held on 17/01/2025 that Judgment of
M/s Naresh Potteries Vs M/s Aarti Industries- Supreme Court clarifies the Role of Authorized Representative in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Involving Companies
2025 INSC 1Â Â REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP
When amount is borrowed on the security of blank cheque , the lender has authority to fill up and present it before bank : Kerala High Court
Kerala High Court in Nakulan v. State of Kerala and another held that When amount is