+91 9387 758 439 mail@jvandassociates.in
logologo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Areas of Practice
    • Corporate Laws – Advisory, Compliance & Litigation
    • Corporate Insolvency (IBC Matters)
    • Banking , Finance & FEMA
    • Trademark & Copy Rights
    • Direct Tax Laws – Advisory & Litigation
    • Civil & Commercial Laws
  • Advisory
  • Blogs & Updates
  • Contact Us

Are you need IT Support Engineer? Free Consultant

Page 5

Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-3

The Supreme Court continued to hear the other issues on merits. Both the appellants and respondents submitted their arguments. Appellants Submissions

Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-2

Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of NCLAT in Bhushan Steel Insolvency case, some of the promoters of

Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-1

On the Civil Appeal preferred by an operational creditor of M/s. Bhushan Power and Steel Limited namely Kalyani Transco  and others,

Order passed by a Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be challenged by filing a revision petition under any provision of the BNSS or the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The Kerala High Court in Union Bank of India v. Manaf (2025 KLT OnLine 1816) vide its judgement dated 10/04/2025 held

Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive

Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive. They are not mandatory, obligatory or peremptory. The

Summons through electronic mode such as email, Whatsapp or Telegram-Notification

The Kerala Procedure for Service of Summons Rules, 2025 has been notified .  As per the rules , upon receipt of

When complainant files a statement that the cheque amount had been received, nothing further remains to be adjudicated and therefore parties can be allowed to compound the matter.

The question before the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the Criminal Revision Petition  # 2024/2012   in the matter of G.Sasidharan Versus Sree

Limitation Period be counted from the date when the right to sue first accrues ;Not On Full Knowledge thereof.

Section 3 of  The Limitation Act, 1963 says that time-barred suits must be dismissed even if the limitation is not pleaded

SEBI cannot claim exemption from the applicability of the principle of res judicata – Supreme Court

The principles of res judicata would be equally applicable in proceedings before administrative authorities. SEBI cannot claim exemption from the applicability

Only the certificate issued under Section 137 of the Trademarks Act1991 can be used for legal purposes.

Only the certificate issued under Section 137 of the Trademarks Act1991 has validity in legal proceedings; not the registration certificate. This

« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 … 11 Next »

Categories

  • Buds Act 2019
  • Code of Civil Procedure
  • Commercial Courts
  • Company Law
  • Contract Act
  • Copy Rights
  • General
  • Income Tax
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law
  • Law of limitation
  • Negotiable Instruments Act
  • SARFAESI
  • SEBI Laws
  • Trademark
logo logo

A law firm having more than 15 years of experience in corporate and related laws.

Speak to our expert at +91 9387 758 439

Email: mail@jvandassociates.in

Contact

Room # 44/783, First Floor,
Penta Estate , Palarivattom,
Kochi-682025.

Office Time:

Mon-friday: 9am To 6pm
Sat-Sunday: Holiday.

Useful Link

  • About
  • Areas of Practice
  • Blog – draft
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer

Area of Practice

  • Corporate Laws – Advisory, Compliance & Litigation
  • Corporate Insolvency (IBC Matters)
  • Banking , Finance & FEMA
  • Trademark & Copy Rights
  • Direct Tax Laws – Advisory & Litigation
  • Dispute Resolution

Useful Websites

  • Kerala High Court
  • National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)
  • National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)
  • Ministry of Corporate Affairs
  • India Code
  • Debt Recovery Tribunal

Copyright © 2024 JV & Associates.

WhatsApp us