Homebuyers cannot claim Bank Loan Interest from Developer for Delay In Flat Delivery: Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 — In a prosecution alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the NI Act, the complainant has an initial burden to prove the transaction, which led to execution of the cheque alleged to be issued by the accused in his favour.
The case Vishnu Prasad v. Gracy Yohannan (Crl.A No. 1216
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, S.138 Proviso (b) — Presence of additional claims in the demand notice would not negate its validity, provided the cheque amount is specified.
The case Apputty v. Yahutty ( Crl.Rev.Pet No. 778 of
Migration of RoC Annual Forms to MCA21 V3
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA) is migrating filing
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, S. 138 – If a cheque is issued to secure repayment of debt or liability and if the debt is not discharged and if on the date of presentation of the cheque, the liability to pay the amount exists and if the said cheque dishonours upon presentation, the consequences contemplated under Section 138 of N.I.Act would follow.
The case Radhakrishnan v. Kerala Agro Industries Corporation Ltd 2025
DRT Can’t Decide Disputes under section 11 of SARFAESI Act; Must Be Referred To Arbitration : Supreme Court
Section 11 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets
An employment contract clause stipulating the employee to work for a minimum term and in default to pay liquidated damage is not – necessarily – violative of Section 27 of the Contract Act.
Whether the employment contract clause stipulating the employee to work
NCLAT has no power to condone delay beyond 45 days under IBC
The IBC prescribes strict timelines for filing appeals and taking legal
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-5
Having thoroughly examined the entire matter factually and legally, Supreme
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-4
Having regard to the elaborate submissions made by the learned
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-3
The Supreme Court continued to hear the other issues on
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-2
Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-1
On the Civil Appeal preferred by an operational creditor of
Order passed by a Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be challenged by filing a revision petition under any provision of the BNSS or the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The Kerala High Court in Union Bank of India v.
Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive
Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling,
Summons through electronic mode such as email, Whatsapp or Telegram-Notification
The Kerala Procedure for Service of Summons Rules, 2025 has
Category
Multiple aggrieved persons can file a single, consolidated application under SARFAESI Act- Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court on 4th June, 2025 held that
Homebuyers cannot claim Bank Loan Interest from Developer for Delay In Flat Delivery: Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 — In a prosecution alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the NI Act, the complainant has an initial burden to prove the transaction, which led to execution of the cheque alleged to be issued by the accused in his favour.
The case Vishnu Prasad v. Gracy Yohannan (Crl.A No. 1216
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, S.138 Proviso (b) — Presence of additional claims in the demand notice would not negate its validity, provided the cheque amount is specified.
The case Apputty v. Yahutty ( Crl.Rev.Pet No. 778 of
Migration of RoC Annual Forms to MCA21 V3
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA) is migrating filing
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, S. 138 – If a cheque is issued to secure repayment of debt or liability and if the debt is not discharged and if on the date of presentation of the cheque, the liability to pay the amount exists and if the said cheque dishonours upon presentation, the consequences contemplated under Section 138 of N.I.Act would follow.
The case Radhakrishnan v. Kerala Agro Industries Corporation Ltd 2025
DRT Can’t Decide Disputes under section 11 of SARFAESI Act; Must Be Referred To Arbitration : Supreme Court
Section 11 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets
An employment contract clause stipulating the employee to work for a minimum term and in default to pay liquidated damage is not – necessarily – violative of Section 27 of the Contract Act.
Whether the employment contract clause stipulating the employee to work
NCLAT has no power to condone delay beyond 45 days under IBC
The IBC prescribes strict timelines for filing appeals and taking legal
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-5
Having thoroughly examined the entire matter factually and legally, Supreme
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-4
Having regard to the elaborate submissions made by the learned
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-3
The Supreme Court continued to hear the other issues on
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-2
Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 17.02.2020 of
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-1
On the Civil Appeal preferred by an operational creditor of
Order passed by a Magistrate under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be challenged by filing a revision petition under any provision of the BNSS or the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The Kerala High Court in Union Bank of India v.