Homebuyers cannot claim Bank Loan Interest from Developer for Delay In Flat Delivery: Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) through its Estate Officer (H) V/s Anupam Garg etc vide
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 — In a prosecution alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the NI Act, the complainant has an initial burden to prove the transaction, which led to execution of the cheque alleged to be issued by the accused in his favour.
The case Vishnu Prasad v. Gracy Yohannan (Crl.A No. 1216 of 2013) (2025 KLT OnLine 2081) Decided on 4th June, 2025
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, S.138 Proviso (b) — Presence of additional claims in the demand notice would not negate its validity, provided the cheque amount is specified.
The case Apputty v. Yahutty ( Crl.Rev.Pet No. 778 of 2004 ) (2025 KLT OnLine 2076) Decided on 28th May 2025
Migration of RoC Annual Forms to MCA21 V3
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA) is migrating filing of the Annual Forms such as AOC-4, AOC-4(XBRL), AOC-4 Addendum/CSR-2, MGT-7,
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, S. 138 – If a cheque is issued to secure repayment of debt or liability and if the debt is not discharged and if on the date of presentation of the cheque, the liability to pay the amount exists and if the said cheque dishonours upon presentation, the consequences contemplated under Section 138 of N.I.Act would follow.
The case Radhakrishnan v. Kerala Agro Industries Corporation Ltd 2025 (Crl.Rev.Pet No. 1340 of 2019) ( KLT OnLine 2063) Decided
DRT Can’t Decide Disputes under section 11 of SARFAESI Act; Must Be Referred To Arbitration : Supreme Court
Section 11 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 says: “ Where any
An employment contract clause stipulating the employee to work for a minimum term and in default to pay liquidated damage is not – necessarily – violative of Section 27 of the Contract Act.
Whether the employment contract clause stipulating the employee to work for a minimum term and in default to pay liquidated damage
NCLAT has no power to condone delay beyond 45 days under IBC
The IBC prescribes strict timelines for filing appeals and taking legal action so as to ensure that insolvency proceedings are not misused to
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-5
Having thoroughly examined the entire matter factually and legally, Supreme Court arrived at the following irresistible conclusions: – Conclusions of the
Bhushan Power and Steel Insolvency case ends up in Liquidation: Part-4
Having regard to the elaborate submissions made by the learned Senior Advocates appearing for the parties, having thoroughly gone through the